Pissed off psychiatrist calls bullshit

And fingers Joseph Biederman, kingpin of the Harvard bipolar child mafia, which directs child psychiatry the world over. Biederman’s a pharma whore and therefore arrogant prick and major mouthpiece for biopsychiatry, the theory that dysfunctional home environments are irrelevant in the cause of bi-polar disorder, which he maintains can start “from the moment the child opens his eyes” at birth.

In Misguided standards of care, a Boston Globe Op-ed Dr. Lawrence Diller holds Biederman morally responsible for his crimes against humanity, and all the little toddler drugging deaths to come.

AS A doctor, I did the nearly unthinkable at a recent conference on bipolar disorder in children. I charged another doctor with moral responsibility in the death last December of Rebecca Riley, a 4 -year-old girl from Hull. Naming names in medicine is just not done very often — and I knew the personal and professional risks I was taking. Yet I felt compelled to name Joseph Biederman, head of the Massachusetts General Hospital’s Pediatric Psychopharmacology clinic, as morally culpable in providing the “science” that allowed Rebecca to die.

Rebecca’s parents have been jailed and charged in her death. They are accused of intentionally overdosing her with clonidine, an anti hypertensive and sedative drug — one of three psychiatric medications prescribed by a Tufts-New England Medical Center child psychiatrist. Rebecca had been treated with these medications since the age of 2 1/2 for the purported diagnosis of bipolar disorder — the new name for manic-depression.

While the psychiatrist involved has withheld comment on the case, both her lawyer and the medical center have defended her actions as “within the standards of care.” Biederman and his colleagues at Harvard are the professionals most responsible for developing and promoting those standards of care — which include diagnosing preschool children as young as 2 with bipolar disorder and treating them with multiple medications.

…Biederman has produced a number of studies and papers purporting to demonstrate the validity of his diagnosis and treatment. His research has always epitomized the best of what the DSM model of psychiatry could expect. But the diagnoses in the manual, in concept, are closely linked to the medical model of biologically based psychiatric disorders and focus exclusively on the individual.

While the manual provides helpful clinical guidance in adults, it begins to unravel with its assumptions about discrete and specific disorders in children and ignores the families and environments in which children live. The ultimate absurdity of this scientific model is diagnosing bipolar disorder in 2 year olds and linking it to the adult disorder with the same name — in the process saddling young children as chronic mental patients condemned to a lifetime of psychiatric drugs.

Even the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry — in its recent parameters on the diagnosis in children — eschews the bipolar diagnosis and its consequent medical treatment in children under 6. Still there are thousands of potential Rebecca Rileys being treated with multiple psychiatric drugs because Biederman has said it’s OK and necessary. Supported by millions of dollars of drug industry promotional funding, Biederman and his colleagues circle the globe offering professional medical “education” for their singular point of view.

Finally, it’s sad but true — the field of child psychiatry is afraid of Biederman. One can hear the worries and fears whispered in the academic halls and clinics over where Biederman has taken the profession. Yet to politely challenge Biederman in public is to risk public retribution and ridicule from him and his team. Also academic researchers in child psychiatry risk losing their funding if they criticize this darling of the pharmaceutical industry, which provides most of the money these days for psychiatric research.

The silence was deafening — and Rebecca’s death pushed me over the edge — because for over a decade I’ve have been uncomfortable about these practices in young children. I am not against psychiatric drugs for children. I’ve written prescriptions for children for 30 years in a clinical practice not tied to the drug industry.

Any time a psychiatrist does the right thing in the face of professional censure is a minor miracle. Dr. Diller, who will survive this, deserves hella thanks and emulation.

More on the bipolar child mafia at Phil’s place (and yes, he coined that term.)

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

13 thoughts on “Pissed off psychiatrist calls bullshit

  1. I am thoroughly confused. At that age, the brain is still developing. How can a diagnosis meant for the implied static condition of adulthood {mature brain} be transferred onto a child of that age?

  2. Bipolar children do exist, but not in the capacity to which they are diagnosed today. I was a bipolar child long before there was such a thing as a bipolar child, or even bipolar disorder. I’ve taken medication since I was seven, and for a time in my mid-twenties, I stopped taking it, out of curiosity. I couldn’t remember a time when I wasn’t medicated, and I wanted the experience. I went off my medication under the guidance of my psychiatrist. I broke down, started hallucinating, lost all control of my former medicated life. I still take medication, and I still have bipolar disorder. I’m just in control of my life now.

  3. I’m always shocked as to why the psychiatrist who was treating Rebecca Riley wasn’t charged in her death. To me she seems just as culpable.

  4. Totally agree with Lee that it is shocking Rebecca Riley’s shrink or Biederman were charged. It is basically an indication of how really dangerous the Biderman created Standards of Care actually are and leave parents and their kids unprotected from this legally sanctioned academic white collar allegedly therapeutic but actually very harmful multiple psychotropic medications or more starkly drugs. Hope more clinical professional opposition surfaces.

  5. True,it’s not against the law to prescribe multiple dangerous psychotropic drugs to small children.So Rebecca Riley’s psychiatrist and Joseph Biederman are always safe from ever going to jail. The double standard here is that if they gave these same drugs that they prescribed to the children, like Rebecca Riley’s parents, they would surely go to jail and be charged with murder just like any parent would. That is why Rebecca Riley’s psychiatrist and Joseph Biederman appear to be so maliciously cruel and callus when championing the unrestrained dangerous drugging of 2 to 5 year olds.

  6. Author: flawedplan
    Comment:
    Charged with what? She didn’t break any laws.

    True. But there is a double standard operating here that the lawyers continue to ignore.

    It is not against the law to PRESCRIBE multiple harmful psychotropic drugs to children 2 to 4 years old, even in excessive amounts, which is how Biederman keeps himself and any other white collar drug dealing psychs out of jail.

    But giving these drugs to children 2 years to 4 years old can result in the parents being jailed and charged with murder like Rebecca Riley’s parents were.

    What is the difference between prescribing a dangerous drug and actually giving it to the child? No matter what anyone says it can end with the same result: death of a small child. Biederman’s and Rebecca’s psychiatrist’s professional “knowledge” did not save Rebecca Riley’s life, in fact just the opposite appears to have occurred. And there is apparently no legal protection against this excessively cruel and callous professional behavior towards small children and their parents. Most people blame Michael Jackson’s doctor for his death, and why not? Michael didn’t have to take all those drugs if he didn’t want to. Rebecca Riley never had that choice just as foster children and parents who let psychiatrists drug their small children. Remember Rebecca Riley was described by observers as looking like a “floppy rag doll” before her death. So the physical harm these multiple drugs in quantity can cause is being continually ignored for the benefit of a very highly compensated Ivy League college professor researcher to be able to assure all parents that the drugs are SAFE.

  7. The difference btwn MJ and RR is people cared about Michael Jackson. I don’t see his fans using his overdose to further their anti psych agenda. You think you’re telling her story but you’ve only exploited the part that works for you. Disgusting.

  8. Disagree. Clearly Biederman and child psychiatrists are exploiting small children and their parents for very big money. And everyone is supposed to act deaf, dumb and blind when Biederman’s shameless promotion and massive psych industry prescription leads to harm and death of small children. Why aren’t you disgusted by that? Everyone then wonders, how you are connected to the industry if you don’t seem to really care about the safety of small children. Anybody that says anything about the drugging death of Rebecca Riley just wants this harmful massive drugging of small children agenda that you apparently support, stopped.

  9. You call that argument? Strawman and ad hominem, I am shocked I tell you. This discussion is about the slimeball appropriation by pharma scolds of the short & tragic life of Rebecca Riley, which you steal and misrepresent to further your agenda. You lay claim to her story, but are no friend of hers, just another in a long line of dirtbags that used her up.

  10. As far as abnormal pyschology/pyschiatry goes… yeah, I’ve always thought it was bull. A bunch of generalizations and flowery names for conditions that apparently did not even exist in our parents’ time. I think nothing is more misdiagnosed than “bipolar disorder” (and it’s associated disorders), leading to travesties like not holding murderers accountable, forcefeeding our kids stupefying meds, etc.

Leave a comment