A man rapes a woman, her resulting PTSD is misdiagnosed as Borderline Personality Disorder.
Women who have been raped are traumatized and eligible for the non-punishing dx of PTSD, which sits on AXIS I of treatable mental illness.
BPD is an AXIS II diagnosis, the AXIS referring to disorders of the personality, that are by definition lifelong and untreatable. What this means is you will never put it behind you:
Fran Lyon is due to give birth to her first child – a daughter she has already named Molly – on January 3. But the prospect, far from being one of joyous anticipation, fills her with a dread that keeps her awake at night.
…For within 30 minutes of birth, barring any medical complications, Molly will be handed by doctors to social workers. They have instructions to take away Fran’s newborn baby and place her in foster care.
The 22-year-old will then be transferred from the maternity wing to a gynaecological ward, because Northumberland Council has decided that Fran – who has never harmed anyone in her life - is potentially a risk to other mothers and their babies.
Fran has no idea if she will be able to touch her baby, even for a minute, before leaving hospital alone, or if she will ever get her daughter back. Her biggest fear is that she won’t, and that Molly will be put up for adoption.
‘It is incredibly upsetting not knowing if I will be allowed even to hold my baby,’ says Fran, a charity worker. ‘Until social services became involved in my life, I was having a normal pregnancy and was full of excitement.’
…Fran is an intelligent and articulate woman. She has nine A- starred GCSEs, five grade A A-levels and is in the third year of a neuroscience degree at Edinburgh University – which she is completing at home in Hexham, Northumberland.
However, what concerns Hexham Children’s Services, which is part of Northumberland Council, is Fran’s medical history.
Having had a difficult relationship with her parents, who are teachers in good state schools, from the age of 15, she started selfharming. Fran spent three years – on and off – in psychiatric hospitals.
Her problems appear to have begun when she was raped by an acquaintance at the age of 14. Diagnosed with a borderline personality disorder, she was discharged from a therapeutic facility in 2002, where she had spent 13 months, and spent nine months as an outpatient.
Today, she needs no medication and, according to her former psychiatrist, Dr Stella Newrith, ‘has made a significant recovery to the point where her difficulties are indistinguishable from those of much of the general population’.
In a letter to Northumberland Council, Dr Newrith, who treated Fran for a year when she was 16 and has known her for many years, stated: ‘There has never been any clinical evidence to suggest that Fran would put herself or others at risk, and there is certainly no evidence to suggest she would put a child at risk of emotional, physical or sexual harm.’
…Yet on August 16, a child protection case conference recommended that Fran’s baby should be taken away at birth – a decision based in part on the contents of a letter from consultant paediatrician Dr Martin Ward Platt, who has never met Fran and could not be present at the meeting.
In his letter, Dr Ward Platt states that ‘even in the absence of psychological assessment, if the professionals were concerned on the evidence available that [this woman] probably does fabricate or induce illness, there would be no option but to put the baby into foster care at birth pending a post-natal forensic psychological assessment’.
However, he warned that it was necessary first to establish as far as possible whether or not Fran does suffer from this illness – something Fran claims they have failed to do.
Fran has never been diagnosed with this condition, yet she has nevertheless been deemed by Northumberland Council as someone likely to suffer from Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy, a controversial and unproven condition in which a parent – usually the mother – makes up or induces an illness in her child to draw attention to herself.
…Despite her own troubled past, Fran Lyon is convinced she can be a good parent, and is desperate to prove that. From the start, she has been open and honest with social workers about her medical history, but she feels this has been used against her.
…The catalyst for her severe mental health problems was, she says, the rape she suffered when she was 14.
…When Fran reported the rape, he was interviewed by police. Three more women claiming they, too, had been attacked came forward and agreed to testify against him. However, in 2001 the man killed himself before the Crown Prosecution Service could decide whether to proceed.
‘After the rape, I became clinically depressed,’ says Fran. ‘I lost a huge amount of weight and was admitted to a psychiatric hospital after trying to kill myself with an overdose of tablets. It wasn’t a cry for help; I wanted to die because of what he had done to me.’
She spent the next three years, on and off, in residential psychiatric hospitals in Oxford, Nottingham and London after being diagnosed with a borderline personality disorder, in her case characterised by self-harming, instability and suicidal tendencies.
At the same time, she worked for two mental health charities, Borderline and Personality Plus. It was through that job, two years ago, that she met the man who is the father of Molly.
…Fran’s case is far from unusual. Two thousands babies under one year old were taken from their parents last year by social services – three times the number ten years ago.
…Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming, chairman of the Justice for Families campaign group:
…’It is estimated that 97 per cent of babies taken away from their mothers at birth, on the basis that the mothers are “capable of emotional abuse”, are never returned to them – and that is simply scandalous.
‘What does Fran’s case tell us? That no woman who has been raped or had mental health problems can be allowed to have a baby, even years later?
‘What could be more traumatic than for a mother to have her baby taken away at birth? It’s monstrous. That, in itself, can cause mental health problems, which is then used by social services against the mother as a reason not to return the baby. It becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy.
‘There has been a massive increase in younger babies being taken into care, before there is even any evidence of harm – and you have to ask why that is.’
~~~
No one in the article asks if the labeling of this woman with BPD enabled the horrible injustice that she’s now dealing with. Of course she could hurt the baby (“attention-seeking”: BPD criterion) , of course she might very well have Munchausen’s, for all we know she could be a supernatural witch, because that’s a woman with BPD is!
Like many so labeled, this troubled woman accepted the BPD dx without knowing its implications, she went on to work in settings that focus on borderline PD, thus making herself a target for the projections the stigma generates in the sexist mental health system. None of this is in the least her fault, but someone needs to make the connection. Labeling women BPD is the first step to calling open season on them.
~~~







[...] 19th, 2007 by giannakali I read this and this today. I read this yesterday. I’m feeling rage. I actually read this sort of stuff [...]
True. So true…
http://ergatonzeteo.blogspot.com/2007/09/fran-lyon.html
Thanks for that link Joy, it’s a good one. I have been puzzling over this post and other blogs I’ve read on the story and just left this comment at your blog. Am publishing it here in case anyone coming by can provide clarity:
Hi Joy,
Thank you for the link. I have a question and have spent the last couple hours trying to get it answered with no luck, maybe you can help, if not, understood, it’s obscure and about the classification manual.
I keep reading that Fran Lyon received the Borderline PD diagnosis, and am wondering if that refers to the American DSM or the WHO ICD, which has something called the Emotionally Unstable Disorder, Borderline Type. The reason I ask is just for clarification, since the DSM uses the multi-axial classification system I talk about in my post, and the ICD does not, and I want to be accurate in my understanding of why BPD is deemed incurable in Britain. In the US we see it is (arbitrarily) located on the lifelong AXIS II, but since the ICD doesn’t use the same coding there goes my simple-minded argument that it’s the AXIS to blame. Though I realize it’s not simple, but I’m just looking for a place to begin. It’s hard to get at the root of psychiatric dogma, and starting with the manuals is ultra problematic since they’re filled with jargon specifically to keep us confused.
So, I’m puzzled as to why I keep seeing this UK person’s diagnosis as Borderline, are Brits using the American Psychiatric Association’s DSM for diagnosing, or is her official dx the ICD code for emotionally unstable, borderline type? Any clarification is much appreciated! Best, Robin
I understand your question. Officially, the UK uses the ICD but in practice often the DSM as well. And in most clinical as well as popular discussion, the term “borderline personality disorder” (ie from the DSM) almost invariably gets used in favour of the ICD equivalent, probably simply because “emotionally unstable personality disorder borderline type” is a bit of a mouthful!
In terms of the treatability question, until about 5 years ago, so-called BPD (ie EUPDBT) was considered definately, unequivocally untreatable. This meant that, by law, mental health services could refuse to treat anyone diagnosed with BPD… or that (and this, I think, happened a lot) were able to diagnose anyone they wished not to treat as having BPD. This meant that a lot of very desperate individuals were turned away by wards and crisis services, but as long as the committed suicide quietly, few people minded. But then, the BPD-as-untreatable dogma began to run into problems when it became clear that secure hospitals and the forensic system could not touch “personality disordered” people, and that people with “personality disorders” were being left to cause chaos and homicides (though actually, there were very few proven cases) because their untreatability meant that, legally, they could not be compelled to accept treatment…
So in 2003 (I think) the UK Department of Health published a paper “Personality Disorder: not longer a diagnoses of exclusion”. This asserted that people with BPD should no longer be refused help and should no longer be seen as beyond. However… they did not change the UK criteria for the way BPD is diagnosed and, as a result, many professionals refuse to accept the new rules. The thinking in the UK is still very much that once-BPD-always-BPD. It’s a diagnosis, which, once given, is highly likely to **** up many of your life plans. And that was precisely what Fran was campaigning against.
Personally speaking, I think they should just burn both the ICD and DSMs. For the damage it can do to people’s lives, I think it should be a criminal offence to diagnose BPD… but that’s just me getting a bit radical…
Since this is a blog, so I can’t start a thread, I’ll put this here. I think it fits somewhat.
Therapy has harmed me. I think it’s done way more damage than good. The first two therapists were wonderful men, very caring, but the were forced out, one after another, by the cognitive coup. Now, even they though, failed at proper labeling of abuse and the resultant complex PTSD.
I think for me, I would be better at this point if I never saw a therapist. I’m virtually certain of it.
Benefits? I’m grateful for meeting those first two men, and for their efforts, and too for the start of an education and awareness of the state of the mental health profession today.
Borderlines can make good mothers — I can introduce you to a couple online if you are interested.
Grizzledandold – therapy also harmed me a great deal … should never have gone since I had never really had trouble in life but I did want to learn how to better deal with verbal and emotional abuse and thought therapy might have some ideas.
Not. It was ridiculous and I was all too kind and tolerant of it … kept saying to myself, this therapist has not had the privileged life and education you have had, be kind. This was a poor idea.
F*cking Amazing!
It reminds me of reading excerpts from the Early Modern European Witchunt.
I have encountered several women over the years who were diagnosed with BPD, and all had admitted sexual traumas in their lives.
I have met other women supposedly getting therapy, who showed all the signs of Rape Related PTSD, but whose “therapists” never discussed the possibility of this condition with them.
I am a housewife. I do not have a college degree. And it never ceases to amaze me, how I can find myself repeatedly more informed about these issues than so-called-professionals.
This kind of sexism, this kind of abuse of the survivor, the breaking up of families.
YOU GET RAPED AND THEN THEY TAKE YOUR BABIES AWAY.
Oh yea, that makes perfect sense.
Well this thread fits neatly into some aspects of your reification thread.
So do these women get to examine the sexual history of their accusers? I mean if the social workers were raped, shouldnt they also be deprived of their children, and loose their liscensing?
What about the Judges? Child Advocates? Because all rape victims carry the potential for BPD, then by the logic presented above, they should not be trusted in positions of authority especially ones that affect children and families.
Dr Platt should loose his license period. Any professional that would offer a binding, diagnosis that has this deleterious effect is unethical and amoral. Kick his butt out of the profession.
Its time for those women to stage a class action law suit. Put out newspaper advertisements, and contact legal representatives.
This is just a whole new kind of rape.
There are hints at this in American CPS proceedings. Where women are considered high risk if they have abuse in their backgrounds.
I would lie.
The stigma of everyday life is bad enough, but this? I would totally lie. No one did anything anyway. There are no legal records. I could lie and no one would be able to prove a thing.
Its this sort of thing that reinforces the stigma of mental illness. Now its no longer about getting treatment. Its about hiding what happened, to avoid public scrutiny and the loss of social, professional, and parental viability.
BTW, you should offer this to the Carnival Against Sexual Violence Blog. That would get a lot of coverage on the issue.
look for abyss2hope a survivors zigzag journey to life
Sorry for the disjointed thought process, but one wonders how much the state is making off of these adoption proceedings?
And will they also be removing children from homes with others prone to BPD/PTSD such as law enforcement and military families?
Just curious.
I am a former BPD sufferer and the mother of an 18-month-old daughter, and the plight of Fran Lyon makes me want to weep. Those of us with any sort of psychiatric histories carry so much shame already, and debate so deeply the decision to have children, that the thought of being penalized retroactively is an utter violation. Through all my struggles to find stability, it was the knowledge that I had the capability within myself to be a good mother that kept me going — I cannot imagine what it would be like to have that taken from me so arbitrarily.
I am normally not a particularly vehement criticizer of the psychiatric and social service communities, having been lucky to have fairly positive experiences (BPD label aside), nor am I English, but I am defiinitely furious. Is there anything we can do, advocacy-wise?
It seems to me that talking about what we can do under the rubric of “advocacy” tends to put advocacy out of reach on some higher plane. Sharing experience is powerful advocacy.
The problem is with people who take their own knowledge as the sine qua non of experience, and the solution is in providing more knowledge, in hopes that some will respond, as you have.
Positive outcomes take nothing away from the negative stories, and vice versa, but the negative stories are the ones we want to look at, because they are negative. That means people with lovely outcomes have to go all humble and see that it’s not all about them. If Fran’s story doesn’t wake them up, maybe nothing will, but that’s no failure of advocacy; let the dead sleep, and the awakening speak up.
I couldn’t help but cry a little reading this. It was surprising I had any tears left. Sometimes words just don’t cut it. …and her parents are teachers and can’t do anything? or most likly deserted her. Both the mother and child will be so much more mixed up and damaged then if they ever had mentioned anything to anyone. Perhaps in”sweeping it under tht rug” our parents generation knew lying is better than being honest and open and real………
One thing I learned is these dime a dozen therapist have to justify their big salaries and only care about furthering their careers. They get big points if they can lable you dangerous to society(mutiple personality) and put you on public record so you can’t go to a doctor(physically bruise ,hurt you so you won’t come back) ,dentist(take your money and refuse to work on teeth),banks, grocery store,
(security everywhere is in need to know including tenents and maintenence in public housing.) this puts your life in danger as of course the public want to be judge and jury, spit at you , destroy your car, anything to get you out.
The worst is the looks on peoples faces (what ever they are told scares the hellout of them) of curse I can’t get my records and have resigned of ever TRY changing them since I am old and on my out of here. Although a law suit sounds sweet. (delusion again) The good thing is I am a cured child rape survivor. I don’t have hate in me or ever have. The release of negative energy and not allowing it in your life and metaphysical studies are my savior. Like the survivors we are, we found LOVE HEALS………. Peace & Blessings to all
OMG!!!! I have a wordepress blog SO SIMILAR to yours!! I even have the Merinda Epstein link! Good on you! I couldnt agree with you more!!
http://traumatised.wordpress.com/
I have just set up a website to expose the way pyschiatry re-traumatises victims of severe trauma and abuse! I’d love you to contribute (If you’d agree!!)
http://www.traumatised.org
I’d love to put a link to your Fran Lyon Article and any other personal stories you’d like aired!!!
Love your page!
Claire
Thanks Claire. That is a great post you linked to, absolutely nailed it. You wrote that? We are sisters! I have some stuff to do but when time permits am going to read your entries, leave comments and put you on my blogroll. Yes, let’s work together, and learn and teach. There are not enough bloggers writing this stuff, we have to expose and encourage each other. Have you read the Memory Artist? Another similar blog by a writer worth connecting with. And I’ve been on wordpress a few years, if you have any technical or how-to questions, let me know. Whatever it takes to keep going.
Hey Robin – Your Fran Lyon article is so well written – Would I have your permission to put it on the Survivor Stories page of my site (accredited to you obviously!) and pop a link to your blog under the links heading?
No need to ask, and I want to give you some unsolicited advice about that. Linking to other posts is like giving the blogger money, links are the “currency.” And I will know instantly when you link to me, it will show up on my own blog. Doing this is the “web” part — how the web of connections are created; to build traffic link to as many people as you can, and don’t discourage them from linking to you by making them ask your permission, because every time someone links to your blog you will know it by checking your comments (if trackbacks are enabled) or by checking your Stats page. Some people might still use your wonderful work without providing a link but you can still find out if that happens by googling your own written phrases, then the results will appear on google if you’ve been plagiarized. I know things are different in academia, and plagiarism does happen in the blogosphere, but we want people to link to and excerpt our writings, survival depends on it, which is why I’m going all school-marm on you. I want your blog to be a household word, it’s that important, and so many need the information you’re putting out. So if you see people linking to your blog posts who did not ask your permission first they are doing the appropriate thing. Let me know if this sounds shady or too bossy, I’m in a mood to create order.